Jump to content

User talk:Explicit

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Wakulla County Florida in 2013.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

shizhao (talk) 03:15, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Shizhao: Are you not familiar with the {{PD-FLGov}} license? plicit 03:33, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the OTRS email? shizhao (talk) 06:43, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Shizhao: It is a work of a government unit of Florida, which can not claim copyright. It can be found on the country's official website. It is in the public domain as it meets the conditions the license specifies. Why exactly is OTRS needed? plicit 12:47, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts about my pictures of Yang Min-hyuk?

[edit]

File:Yang Min-hyuk 15032025 (1).jpg File:Yang Min-hyuk 15032025 (2).jpg File:Yang Min-hyuk 15032025 (3).jpg File:Yang Min-hyuk 15032025 (4).jpg File:Yang Min-hyuk 15032025 (5).jpg File:Yang Min-hyuk 15032025 (6).jpg File:Yang Min-hyuk 15032025 (7).jpg File:Yang Min-hyuk 15032025 (8).jpg File:Yang Min-hyuk 15032025 (9).jpg

I only asked you because you took pictures of Korean footballers. Timmy96 (talk) 10:22, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Timmy96: Hey, not bad! You got up closer to him than I did, that's for sure. plicit 11:16, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
File:B.I - 2016 Gaon Chart K-pop Awards red carpet 0.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kielich25 (talk) 19:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bobby - 2016 Gaon Chart K-pop Awards red carpet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kielich25 (talk) 19:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Musicians by hair color has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Trade (talk) 12:44, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Actors by hair color has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Trade (talk) 18:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alpine nw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:51, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:New Taipei Metro logo new logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No license, no permission, complex logo exceeds COM:COO Taiwan
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Wcam (talk) 13:34, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Taipei Metro logo new logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wcam (talk) 15:48, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could this be deleted?

[edit]

Hello,

Could this discussion page be deleted? While it is not a standard practice to delete nomination pages, this could be necessary for my privacy, reputation, and safety. I am young, and I made a mistake. I have taken responsibility for my actions, and I have not repeated it.

Thank you Flame, not lame 💔 (Don't talk to me.) 01:31, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Flame, not lame: Hi, I'm not aware of any policy that would allow me to delete the deletion request page. I'm not sure if the discussion can be hidden from public view, but perhaps inquiring for oversight may help. plicit 11:41, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for undeletion of my images

[edit]

Hi,

Upon request of some editors, I hereby request the undeletion of the following images I took:

1. File:Line_2_Gilmore_Station_Platform_1.jpg

2. File:Line_2_V._Mapa_Station_Platform_1.jpg

While there is no FOP in the Philippines, photographers like me are given clearance by the agency owning the infrastructure to take pictures on the platform areas before we can take photos therefore the rule on licensing takes precedence. Photos taken by those given permission like me can be used based on our discretion. Unauthorized picture taking is not allowed inside the premises and therefore cannot be uploaded. The nominator is not aware of this situation in the Philippines and therefore removed the photos erroneously.

Should there be a need to show the approval letter of the agency as proof, please do let me know.

Korean Rail Fan (talk) 06:08, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Korean Rail Fan: Such a claim requires proof of permission. You will either need obtain such permission and follow the instructions at COM:CONSENT, or appeal the deletion at COM:UND. plicit 11:41, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]